Search and history
AvoidConfidence mediumCoverage 100%Evidence strong10-year outlook: High risk

(주)대동

High risk for a healthy 3-10 year stay.

Verdict
Avoid
Signal score
36/100
Evidence coverage
100%
Red flags
4
Generated
7/3/2026

Overall opinion

The report points to a survival-mode employment outlook with a 36/100 score and medium confidence. Daedong still has real operating scale, positive operating profit, official evidence coverage, moderate hiring signals, and IP/R&D activity, but the long-term employee risk is elevated: operating profit remains far below its available peak, debt ratio is high, net losses continued in 2024 and 2025, and recent National Pension Service employment history shows more leavers than joiners over the last 12 months. This is not enough to call it a stable 10-year platform; it is a cautious, high-risk long-term bet that should be considered only if the specific role, team stability, workload, and backfill reason check out clearly.

Immediate red flags
  • Financial trend is weakening.
  • Employment trend is weak.
  • Medium severity other risk: Financing-cost and leverage pressure despite operating recovery.
  • Medium severity other risk: Continued net losses and weak operating cash flow.

Employment outlook

A job-seeker view of whether this looks like a healthy 3-10 year place to join.

Company state
Survival mode
Resource pressure
High
Career upside
Reasonable
Peak to now
Severe
Employee experience risk
Medium

Company signals point to preservation mode; confidence is high.

Resource pressure looks high enough to affect team conditions.

Employee-experience risk exists and should be checked.

Outlook drivers

  • Company state: survival-mode signal
  • Peak-to-now decline: severe
  • Resource pressure: high
  • Employee risk: medium
  • Career upside: reasonable

Next checks

  • Validate runway, attrition, and team load before accepting.
  • Use interviews to confirm the report pattern still holds.
  • Review the report's underlying sources for the original checks.

Score by category

This chart shows which dimensions pull the score up or down.

Category drill-down

Open a category to see the exact reasons used by the report.

  • Operating profit is positive.
  • Operating profit trend is weakening.
  • Debt ratio is elevated.
  • Audit opinion is clean.
  • Web financial signal is mixed.
  • Headcount is large enough to reduce single-team risk.
  • NPS history shows high recent churn.
  • More people left than joined over the last 12 months.
  • Recent NPS history shows net employee loss.
  • NTS/Hometax status: 계속사업자.
  • The company has operated for at least five years.
  • NTS/Hometax tax type: 부가가치세 일반과세자.
  • Medium severity other risk: Financing-cost and leverage pressure despite operating recovery.
  • Medium severity other risk: Continued net losses and weak operating cash flow.
  • Web research found positive market momentum.
  • Web research found negative market momentum.
  • IP/R&D public signal is recorded as context only.
  • Hiring velocity is moderate.
  • Official average annual salary is 6100만 원.
  • Official average tenure is 7.3 years.
  • Web hiring signal is moderate.

Decision notes

Positives

  • 2025 revenue increased versus 2024, and operating profit recovered from 2024 while remaining positive.
  • The audit opinion is clean, and official sources show the company is an active business with at least five years of operating history.
  • The employer proxy includes large headcount, official average annual salary of KRW 61 million, and official average tenure of 7.3 years.
  • Hiring velocity is described as moderate, with evidence of recruiting across several functions, although cited postings were closed or expired.
  • KIPRISPlus returned 16 official IP records, supporting some R&D or product-development activity.

Risks

  • Overall score is 36/100 with medium confidence, and the employment outlook labels the company high-risk for long-term employment.
  • Operating profit is about 52% below its available peak, despite the 2025 recovery.
  • Debt ratio remains elevated at about 252% in 2025, and the liquidity ratio is around 100%, indicating limited financial cushion.
  • Net income was negative in both 2024 and 2025, and web risk extraction cites continued net losses, weak operating cash flow, leverage pressure, and finance-cost pressure.
  • Recent NPS history shows 285 leavers versus 268 joiners over 12 months, including sharp negative months such as September 2025 and May 2026.

Next checks

  • Ask whether the role is replacement hiring or new headcount, and why the previous person left if it is a backfill.
  • Ask directly about overtime, weekend work, workload spikes, and whether cost controls are affecting staffing or benefits.
  • Check team-level turnover for the exact department, because company-wide headcount is large but recent NPS data shows churn stress.
  • Verify current open roles and hiring plan, since cited job postings were closed or expired and do not prove current hiring volume.
  • Ask management how the company plans to address debt, finance costs, net losses, and weak operating cash flow without cutting employee investment.

Source mix

Available11
Missing0
Not configured0
Error0